<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn Makes It Easier to Connect with People You Know, Harder with People You Don&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/</link>
	<description>Together we're smarter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Best of Linked Intelligence 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of Linked Intelligence 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=138#comment-175</guid>
		<description>[...] LinkedIn Makes It Easier to Connect with People You Know, Harder with People You Don&#8217;t - One of the big functionality changes on LinkedIn this year was the introduction of the ability to reconnect with former colleagues, classmates and business partners without having their email address. At the same time, LinkedIn made it possible to indicate that you don&#8217;t know the sender of a connection request and created consequences for doing so. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LinkedIn Makes It Easier to Connect with People You Know, Harder with People You Don&#8217;t - One of the big functionality changes on LinkedIn this year was the introduction of the ability to reconnect with former colleagues, classmates and business partners without having their email address. At the same time, LinkedIn made it possible to indicate that you don&#8217;t know the sender of a connection request and created consequences for doing so. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinkedIn Policy Changes? Let&#8217;s Hope So&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>LinkedIn Policy Changes? Let&#8217;s Hope So&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=138#comment-165</guid>
		<description>[...] a new customer service center and increased support staff significantly earlier this year, some policy changes made shortly thereafter flooded their customer service department with complaints from users whose [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a new customer service center and increased support staff significantly earlier this year, some policy changes made shortly thereafter flooded their customer service department with complaints from users whose [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 07:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=138#comment-171</guid>
		<description>At the moment it seems to be duration of membership. Even some of us who applaud the basic concept think that's way too severe and that it should be a rolling window.

Simple solution to the problem, though - slow down a bit and just e-mail people before you send them the invitation. Zero rejections using that approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the moment it seems to be duration of membership. Even some of us who applaud the basic concept think that&#8217;s way too severe and that it should be a rolling window.</p>
<p>Simple solution to the problem, though - slow down a bit and just e-mail people before you send them the invitation. Zero rejections using that approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 07:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=138#comment-170</guid>
		<description>I didnt realize that I was getting 'rejections' to my evites. How long do the 'restrictions' last for? For a specified amount of time? duration of membership?

thanks,
Hugh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt realize that I was getting &#8216;rejections&#8217; to my evites. How long do the &#8216;restrictions&#8217; last for? For a specified amount of time? duration of membership?</p>
<p>thanks,<br />
Hugh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Can&#8217;t I Just Say No Any More?</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Can&#8217;t I Just Say No Any More?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 15:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=138#comment-173</guid>
		<description>[...] LinkedIn made some changes in the way invitations work, adding some automated consequences for sending invitations to people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LinkedIn made some changes in the way invitations work, adding some automated consequences for sending invitations to people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 05:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=138#comment-169</guid>
		<description>RE: Follow up to "Frozen Account"

I believe that their system is actually broken - as in - "There is a bug in there that they cannot or will not fix and they are not coming clean with users about the un-repairable defect in their code."

My account has been restricted.

I have only sent only a couple of invitations in the last couple of months and only two since they instituted the latest "your account has been frozen" program. These were all sent to people who communicated by e-mail and who requested that I invite them to connect.

They all accepted.

There is no possible way that I could have had five people indicate that they did not know me because I have not invited five people to connect recently.


1. The system is broken.
2. They refuse to acknowledge that it is broken.
3. They refuse to fix it.
4. They refuse to correct the mess that it creates.
5. Customer Service has been non-responsive.
6. Duncan has refused to respond to my inquiries.

(Is he [Duncan] still there?)

(PS: I have since heard from Vincent Wright that Duncan no longer works for LinkedIn.)

Bill Austin
Chief Technology Officer AZhttp, Inc,
http://www.azhttp.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/billaustin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Follow up to &#8220;Frozen Account&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe that their system is actually broken - as in - &#8220;There is a bug in there that they cannot or will not fix and they are not coming clean with users about the un-repairable defect in their code.&#8221;</p>
<p>My account has been restricted.</p>
<p>I have only sent only a couple of invitations in the last couple of months and only two since they instituted the latest &#8220;your account has been frozen&#8221; program. These were all sent to people who communicated by e-mail and who requested that I invite them to connect.</p>
<p>They all accepted.</p>
<p>There is no possible way that I could have had five people indicate that they did not know me because I have not invited five people to connect recently.</p>
<p>1. The system is broken.<br />
2. They refuse to acknowledge that it is broken.<br />
3. They refuse to fix it.<br />
4. They refuse to correct the mess that it creates.<br />
5. Customer Service has been non-responsive.<br />
6. Duncan has refused to respond to my inquiries.</p>
<p>(Is he [Duncan] still there?)</p>
<p>(PS: I have since heard from Vincent Wright that Duncan no longer works for LinkedIn.)</p>
<p>Bill Austin<br />
Chief Technology Officer AZhttp, Inc,<br />
<a href="http://www.azhttp.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.azhttp.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/billaustin" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com/in/billaustin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 05:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=138#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Not sure. They would certainly be able to see that the request was declined, but I don't know if they can tell that it was specifically flagged with the "I don't know &lt;sender&gt;" button.

Also, I think it's at least a little bit questionable that they don't really let recipients know the consequences of clicking that button. There are some people who might not use it if they knew the consequences of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure. They would certainly be able to see that the request was declined, but I don&#8217;t know if they can tell that it was specifically flagged with the &#8220;I don&#8217;t know <sender>&#8221; button.</p>
<p>Also, I think it&#8217;s at least a little bit questionable that they don&#8217;t really let recipients know the consequences of clicking that button. There are some people who might not use it if they knew the consequences of it.</sender></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean @ Sachi Studio</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean @ Sachi Studio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 04:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=138#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Scott,
 Will the inviter know who it was that flagged them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
 Will the inviter know who it was that flagged them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William_j</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>William_j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 12:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=138#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Yes, changing the scheme was necessary. But I don't think that it's quite right to let other peoples to ban you if they want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, changing the scheme was necessary. But I don&#8217;t think that it&#8217;s quite right to let other peoples to ban you if they want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/linkedin-makes-it-easier-to-connect-with-people-you-know-harder-with-people-you-dont/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=138#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Yeah - the e-mail address thing kind of baffles me. That's pretty low-hanging fruit. It really is "a simple matter of programming" to look for an @ symbol or other punctuation that's not appropriate for a name. There's no practical need for more than one space in the first name or two spaces in the last name either.

Still, I suppose there's not much they'll ever be able to do to prevent me from being Scott Atlinkedintelligencedotcom Allen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah - the e-mail address thing kind of baffles me. That&#8217;s pretty low-hanging fruit. It really is &#8220;a simple matter of programming&#8221; to look for an @ symbol or other punctuation that&#8217;s not appropriate for a name. There&#8217;s no practical need for more than one space in the first name or two spaces in the last name either.</p>
<p>Still, I suppose there&#8217;s not much they&#8217;ll ever be able to do to prevent me from being Scott Atlinkedintelligencedotcom Allen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
