<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 New LinkedIn Features 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkedintelligence.com/top-new-linkedin-features-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/top-new-linkedin-features-2007/</link>
	<description>The unofficial source for all things LinkedIn&#8482;.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Got LinkedIn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Save LinkedIn Profile as a PDF</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/top-new-linkedin-features-2007/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Got LinkedIn &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Save LinkedIn Profile as a PDF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=381#comment-569</guid>
		<description>[...] across a post from Dec. 30th.? In this post he was discussing some of the features added in 2007 (See Full List) and noticed he mentioned a way to save a profile to a pdf.? I&#8217;ve looked at 100&#8217;s of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] across a post from Dec. 30th.? In this post he was discussing some of the features added in 2007 (See Full List) and noticed he mentioned a way to save a profile to a pdf.? I&#8217;ve looked at 100&#8217;s of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/top-new-linkedin-features-2007/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=381#comment-567</guid>
		<description>Good summary, thank you.

I think we should all be careful not just to repeat all of LinkedIn's own claims about its "new features." Your number 6 does this. As I blogged at the time, there were no new management features added at the time of posting you link to. A week or so later they added one feature which had been recommended to them months earlier (showing pending members' profile links from the pending list).

Groups really didn't change functionally at all this year, beyond the ease of creating a group. You create a group once - but you're stuck with the features forever. That's where the improvements should go. Why make it easier to create a group that doesn't have real functionality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary, thank you.</p>
<p>I think we should all be careful not just to repeat all of LinkedIn&#8217;s own claims about its &#8220;new features.&#8221; Your number 6 does this. As I blogged at the time, there were no new management features added at the time of posting you link to. A week or so later they added one feature which had been recommended to them months earlier (showing pending members&#8217; profile links from the pending list).</p>
<p>Groups really didn&#8217;t change functionally at all this year, beyond the ease of creating a group. You create a group once - but you&#8217;re stuck with the features forever. That&#8217;s where the improvements should go. Why make it easier to create a group that doesn&#8217;t have real functionality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedintelligence.com/top-new-linkedin-features-2007/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linkedintelligence.com/?p=381#comment-568</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Not only do they have processes in place which usually resolve the issue, you can actually get hold of a real person (via email) who can help.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have never gotten anything but an automated non-answer from LinkedIn. That's usually a promise for a reply that never comes. Getting a resolution or reply from a human must be a paid-feature only.

My experience is that LinkedIn is only slightly less responsive to reported problems and inquiries than... Yahoo Mail Customer Service. And that's bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Not only do they have processes in place which usually resolve the issue, you can actually get hold of a real person (via email) who can help.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have never gotten anything but an automated non-answer from LinkedIn. That&#8217;s usually a promise for a reply that never comes. Getting a resolution or reply from a human must be a paid-feature only.</p>
<p>My experience is that LinkedIn is only slightly less responsive to reported problems and inquiries than&#8230; Yahoo Mail Customer Service. And that&#8217;s bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
